<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miley Cyrus &#8220;BJ&#8221; Pics Fake; No Miley Cyrus Photo Scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tv.popcrunch.com/miley-cyrus-bj-pics-fake-no-miley-cyrus-photo-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tv.popcrunch.com/miley-cyrus-bj-pics-fake-no-miley-cyrus-photo-scandal/</link>
	<description>A TV talboid for television junkies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:45:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://tv.popcrunch.com/miley-cyrus-bj-pics-fake-no-miley-cyrus-photo-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-20606</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.popcrunch.com/?p=14848#comment-20606</guid>
		<description>The photo is real.

1) EXIF data:

Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000
Flash: No flash function
Focus: At 0mm
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%

2) Picture taken at that very night on Miley’s Twitter, with EXIF date proving it - http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg. Shows her with the same rosy cheeks and the same hairstyle.

3) The combination diagram, which the Inquisitr, Paparrazzis, and other websites took as evidence for it being a photoshop, was in fact created by a digg.com user to prove that it is real. Her head’s position is a little different than in those two photos, something that cannot be done in photoshop.

4) The original photo had TrainReq’s watermark. Sound familiar? Same guy who leaked all the other Miley photos from her e-mail account.

I’m sick and tired of misinformation being spread around. Tabloid websites should hire people who actually do research, and not just jump to conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photo is real.</p>
<p>1) EXIF data:</p>
<p>Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000<br />
Flash: No flash function<br />
Focus: At 0mm<br />
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM<br />
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)<br />
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%</p>
<p>2) Picture taken at that very night on Miley’s Twitter, with EXIF date proving it &#8211; <a href="http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg</a>. Shows her with the same rosy cheeks and the same hairstyle.</p>
<p>3) The combination diagram, which the Inquisitr, Paparrazzis, and other websites took as evidence for it being a photoshop, was in fact created by a digg.com user to prove that it is real. Her head’s position is a little different than in those two photos, something that cannot be done in photoshop.</p>
<p>4) The original photo had TrainReq’s watermark. Sound familiar? Same guy who leaked all the other Miley photos from her e-mail account.</p>
<p>I’m sick and tired of misinformation being spread around. Tabloid websites should hire people who actually do research, and not just jump to conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
