TV Crunch

Lipstick Jungle Reviews: Generally Bad

2

February 7th, 2008 by Wendy

Tagged as: Lipstick Jungle, NBC

Lipstick Jungle
So, I’m not sure that “Lipstick Jungle” is going to be such a slam-dunk, despite NBC’s best attempts to market the heck out of it.

“Lipstick Jungle,” which stars Brooke Shields, Kim Raver and Lindsay Price as career women, debuts tonight — but will you be watching? And will “Lipstick Jungle” be different enough from “Cashmere Mafia” to matter? Or will both of these new women’s series cancel each other out?

Catch “Lipstick Jungle” tonight at 10 PM on NBC and let me know what you think.

Here are just a few of the poor reviews for “Lipstick Jungle:”

  • Washington Post review calls it “glittery junk that nobody needs.”
  • L.A. Times says “Lipstick Jungle is to Sex and the City what New Coke was to Coca-Cola — a brand extension best forgotten.”
  • Seattle Post Intelligencer says it’s a “tacky soap opera.”

2 Comments, add yours

Related Articles:

What's Hot at PopCrunch?


2 Responses to “Lipstick Jungle Reviews: Generally Bad”

  1. On November 13th 2008, lisa wrote:

    I LOVE LIPSTICK JUNGLE!!!!! I look forward to the show and love the story lines and the characters and the people who play them!!!! This really sucks!!!

  2. On November 14th 2008, Kathy wrote:

    I AM SOOOOOO DISAPPOINTED THAT LIPSTICK JUNGLE IS GOING TO BE CANCELLED. I THINK IT IS WELL WRITTEN, AND NOT AT ALL LIKE SEX AND THE CITY. IT IS SOPHISTICATED AND EMOTIONAL. LOVE ALL THE ACTORS! AM VERY UPSET.

What do you think?

comment policy